Industry · Healthcare

Accessibility requirements for Healthcare websites

Healthcare sites face heightened accessibility risk: patients searching for care commonly include older users and users with disabilities. ADA Title III and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act both apply to most providers in the US.

Regulations that apply

Healthcare sits at the intersection of general digital-accessibility law and sector-specific obligations. The most relevant items to track:

  • ADA Title III + Section 1557 ACA

    HHS published a 2024 final rule requiring WCAG 2.1 AA for healthcare web and apps.

    US
  • EAA

    Telehealth and consumer-facing patient services covered.

    EU

The accessibility risks specific to Healthcare

Every industry has its own failure pattern. The combination below is what audits, complaints, and lawsuits in this sector keep returning to. Fixing them clears the most-cited issues without touching every page.

  • Inaccessible appointment booking flows

    Calendar widgets and time-pickers frequently lack keyboard support.

    2.1.1, 4.1.2
  • Medication and form intake PDFs that are scanned images

    Patients with visual impairments cannot fill them.

    1.1.1
  • Telehealth video without captions

    Live captions during telehealth are increasingly mandated.

    1.2.4

A short remediation checklist

Most Healthcare teams do not need a 200-item audit before they fix anything. They need an ordered list of the highest-impact moves. Start with these and re-audit after each pass.

  • Audit booking, intake, and patient portal login

  • Re-export PDFs as accessible (tagged) documents

  • Add live captions to telehealth video

Run a free Certvo scan against your homepage and one task-flow URL (login, checkout, booking). It pinpoints which of the issues above apply to you, and how often.

Scoping an audit for Healthcare

Healthcare carries 2 distinct obligations to satisfy — ADA Title III + Section 1557 ACA, EAA — spanning US and EU. An auditor prices the work by how many of those regimes are in scope and how many distinct task flows carry them, not by page count.

The 3 failure patterns above map to 2.1.1, 4.1.2, 1.1.1, 1.2.4. Every one of those is machine-detectable, which means a scan can clear them before an auditor starts charging by the hour. What remains for manual review is the judgement work: whether inaccessible appointment booking flows actually functions end to end for a screen-reader user.

  • Scan first, audit second

    Clearing the 3 automated patterns above shortens the manual pass to the flows that need a person.

  • Scope by template, not by page

    A site with thousands of pages usually has fewer than twenty distinct templates. Price the templates.

  • Re-test after remediation

    The conformance claim rests on the re-test, not the first report.

  • Evidence for US

    Keep dated scan history — it is what turns a conformance claim into something a regulator accepts.

Other industries

Find every accessibility issue on your site in 60 seconds.

Free public scan. No card. AI-generated fixes for every issue we find.